Valance Rear GT 1967-1968

CJ's Part Number: V2RB
CJ's Low Price:
1472342400 37636
Earn 42 RPM Points What's this?
Valance Rear GT 1967-1968

Product Description

Rear Valance for all 1967-1968 GT Mustangs.

Sprucing up the back of your 1967-1968 GT has never been easier thanks to this high-quality Rear Valance! This valance is made out of sturdy heavy gauge stamped steel and also has holes already in it for your Mustang's backup lights as well as cut-outs for your dual exhaust tips.

The rear valance is located below your Pony's rear bumper. It bolts to the rear of both of your quarter panels.

When everyone looks at your Mustang, the first thing they're going to see is the condition of the Mustang's body and sheet metal. CJ Pony Parts is positive that you'll want your Mustang looking its best, so we offer thousands of body and sheet metal parts!

Order a Rear Valance for your 1967-1968 GT Mustang from CJ Pony Parts today!

Similar Mustang Parts

similar Mustang parts More Mustang Parts  

Installation Instructions


Difficulty: Moderate

Mustang Applications

This product will fit the following Ford Mustang years:

Product Reviews

Write a review
Valance Rear GT 1967-1968 is rated 1.0 out of 5 by 1.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Too narrow Was not wide enough to meet the quarters. Compared to the banged up original part confirmed this.
Date published: 2015-11-29
  • 2016-08-28T07:46CST
  • bvseo_cps, prod_bvrr, vn_cps_3.3.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_1
  • loc_en_US, sid_V2RB, PRD, sort_relevancy
  • clientName_cjponyparts
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 113.57ms

Product Questions

will this fit on my 68 convertible without modification. Im putting a hooker header flomaster series 40 system on and want the cutouts for the tailpipes.

Asked by: smokeybob

Why does the Dynacorn rear valence for base model '68Cougar cost more $64.99  than cost $60.99 of Dynacorn rear valence for a GT model '68Cougar; appears the GT Valence required more sheet metal cutting to allow for the exhaust pipe extensions? Mixup?

Asked by: Ward
  • 2016-08-28T08:14CST
  • bvseo_cps, prod_bvqa, vn_cps_3.3.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestions, tq_2
  • loc_en_US, sid_V2RB, PRD, sort_recentAnswersFirst
  • clientName_cjponyparts
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 117.6ms

You Might Also Like