CJ Classics Valance Rear GT Without Backup Light Holes 1965-1966

CJ Classics:
3642E
CJ Classics Valance Rear GT Without Backup Light Holes 1965-1966 is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 3.
  • y_2019, m_10, d_20, h_6
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.13
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3
  • loc_en_US, sid_3642E, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_cjponyparts
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 197.4ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

Highlights

  • Direct-Fit Replacement
  • Heavy Gauge Steel
  • Black E-Coat Finish
  • GT Style Rear Valance
MSRP $64.99
$39.99
You save 38%

CJ Classics GT-Style Rear Valance without Backup Light Holes for 1965-1966 Mustangs.

This high-quality reproduction rear valance from CJ Classics is constructed from heavy-gauge stamped steel for great durability and bolts-on for an easy installation. This valance features holes for dual exhaust tips as found on classic GT model Mustangs. It attaches to the rear of both quarter panels below the rear bumper with your OE factory mounting hardware. CJ Classics is the industry leader when it comes to durable body and sheet metal pieces, so trust them to get the exact look you want for your classic beauty's exterior!

*This CJ Classics rear valance is a GT-style reproduction that has cutouts for the dual exhaust only--does not have holes cut for backup lights.

Since restoring an old Ford Mustang is a long and strenuous process, you are going to want to go somewhere that can serve all of your OE needs at once. Because we are dedicated to helping pony car fans from all walks of life, CJ Classics carries a wide variety of reproduction Mustang parts & accessories that will help get your classic muscle car out of the showroom and back on the roadway, where it belongs!

Order this premium CJ Classics 3642E GT-Style Rear Valance without Backup Light Holes for your 1965-1966 Mustang today from CJ Pony Parts!

Vehicle Fitment

This product will fit the following Mustang years:

Rated 4 out of 5 by from The Dynacorn look and fits good Previously, I bought the less expensive Rear Valance Panel. The fit and look was horrible. I spent the extra money which was not much and got the Dynacorn. It has thicker metal, better fit and it looks much better. Still had to do a little fabrication but not much.
Date published: 2015-09-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by from GT rear valance I bought both the Dynacorn and the other brand (I have two cars) and I could feel the difference in the quality between the two. I wish I'd have bought two Dynacorn valances.
Date published: 2017-06-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Fits perfect ! Top quality , fit up is perfect. A little bit of work required where tags are spot welded .
Date published: 2017-02-25
  • y_2019, m_10, d_20, h_6
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.13
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3
  • loc_en_US, sid_3642E, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_cjponyparts
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 4.11ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

I'm doing a restomod on a 65 Mustang conv. It's not a GT, but I like the look of exhaust pipes through the rear valance. If I order a rear valance panel (Dynacorn) that has exhaust cutouts, will there still be enough clearance for the rear bumper guards?

Asked by: ScottA
While the standard bumper is used, the bumper guards are omitted on the GT.
Answered by: CJ Pony Parts
Date published: 2015-07-06
  • y_2019, m_10, d_20, h_6CST
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_2.0.13
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_1
  • loc_en_US, sid_3642E, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=LAST_APPROVED_ANSWER_SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_cjponyparts
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getContent, 128.15ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT